**EER** or * Energy-Efficiency Ratio* is an energy performance rating for, primarily, cooling devices. You will find them in any air conditioner specification sheet. The energy-efficiency ratio is invaluable when comparing different air conditioners as far as energy-efficiency is concerned.

*What is EER?*

Definition: EER rating provides you with a ratio of

useful cooling output(in BTU/h)toelectricity input(measured in W).

A higher EER rating means that an air conditioner will provide a lot of cooling effect for every Watt of energy you provide.

*What is EER in AC?*

**Quick example:** We have a 10,000 BTU AC unit with 10 EER. EER rating (10) tells us that we’ll need to provide an air conditioner with 1,000W of power to give us 10,000 BTU of cooling capacity.

We’ll look at how EER is calculated and see what a good EER rating for different types of air conditioners is.

Table of Contents

## How To Calculate EER Rating Of An Air Conditioner

Calculating the EER rating is very simple. You need to know only two practical metrics:

**Capacity**of an air conditioner.*Examples: 6,000 BTU, 10,000 BTU, 12,000 BTU, 18,000 BTU.***Power**of an air conditioner.*Examples: 800W, 1,000W, 1,200W, 1,400W.*

To get an EER rating, you need to divide an air conditioner’s capacity by its power. Here’s the EER equation to use:

**EER rating = Capacity (in BTU) / Power (in W)**

Let’s say we have a 12,000 BTU mini split air conditioner that is powered by 1000W. We can calculate the EER rating like this:

**EER rating = 12,000 BTU / 1000 W = 12**

EER rating of 12 tells us that for every 1W of energy we provide to the air conditioner, the air conditioner will give us 12 BTU of cooling effect.

That’s much better than, let’s say, a 12,000 BTU 1,400W air conditioner. EER rating, in this case, would be 12,000BTU/1,400W = 8.57. That means that for every 1W of energy, this AC would provide us with only 8.57 BTU of cooling effect instead of 12 BTU. In turn, this makes the EER 12 unit 40% more energy-efficient than EER 8.57 unit.

12 EER rating is an excellent energy-efficiency rating for an air conditioner. Some of the best devices can even reach more than 12 EER. The best mini split air conditioners have an extremely high 12+ EER rating (check them here).

It is, however, important to understand that EER is based on a fixed set of conditions, namely:

- Outdoor temperature:
**95F** - Indoor temperature:
**80F** - Relative humidity:
**50%**

Obviously, in real-life conditions, different air conditioners will perform differently. That’s why additional metrics such as SEER and CEEP have been introduced. EER is mostly used for room air conditioners, SEER for central air conditioners, and CEEP for window air conditioners’ energy-efficiency.

## What Is a Good EER Rating For AC Unit?

Some types of air conditioners are more energy-efficient than others.

The simplest way of checking which ones are a smart choice if you want to see some electricity bill savings is to check their EER rating.

EER rating is most commonly used when comparing room air conditioners. The most popular of these are portable air conditioners, which can be easily moved from one room to another.

The average EER rating of portable AC units is about 8.5. That means buying ones below EER 8.5 is not advisable and buying those above 8.5 is quite a smart move efficiency-wise. The most energy-efficient portable AC unit (Whynter Dual-Hose) has an **EER rating of 11.2**.

Here is a chart of how energy-efficient * portable air conditioners* are (in %) compared to a standard EER 8.5 portable AC unit:

As you can see, an EER 7 unit, for example, is 18% less efficient than the EER 8.5 unit. That means it will spend 18% more electricity for the same effect.

On the other end of the spectra, we see that an EER 11 unit is 29% more efficient than an EER 8.5 unit. In comparison, it will be 29% less costly to run an EER 11 portable air conditioner.

A special case are the battery-powered portable AC units. For example, the best battery-powered AC Zero Breeze Mark 2 has an EER rating of only 3.54, despite being a dual-hose unit. That is, sadly, the nature of battery-powered electrical devices.

### Theoretical Maximum EER (Based On 1st Law Of Thermodynamics)

In practice, EER rating is calculated by dividing an air conditioner’s capacity with the input power, as we’ve seen above. However, by applying the first law of thermodynamics, we can calculate the maximum EER a perfect air conditioner could have.

Theoretical EER derives from the COP ratio (Coefficient Of Performance; A basic metric for cooling and heating devices). Here is the equation that calculates the maximum EER from COP:

**COP = T _{cold} / (T_{hot }– T_{cold})**

**EER = 3.41 x COP**

where T_{hot} is the hot summer temperature outside, and T_{cold} is the cold temperature that we want the air conditioner to provide inside our house.

Let’s say we have a scorching summer. The outside temperature is 95F (T_{hot} = 308K), and we want to cool down to 80F (T_{cold} = 300K). To calculate the theoretical maximum EER for these conditions, we have to plug the temperature (in degrees Celsius) in the upper equation:

**EER = 3.41 x 300K / (308K – 300K) = 127.9**

Obviously, the EER rating in real-life can be even 10 or more times lower.

I need calculation of EER (average) of AC 9000 Btu of refrigerant 600a and 744

Hello Paulo, to calculate EER you need two numbers; 9000 BTU and power (in Watts). If, for example, the 9000 BTU unit is powered by 1000 W, the EER rating is 9.

How could I get Watts value from uninstalled AC?

Hello Darwin, you can check out our article about ‘How Many Watts Does My Air Conditioner Use’ here. Basically, if the specification sticker is still on the device, you can check the Watts directly. There is another black or white label with Voltage, Amperage, and Power; try to find it on the uninstalled device.

Why?

“Obviously, the EER rating in real-life can be even 10 or more times lower.”

What is the difference EER=3.41xCOP and ERR=(BTU/hr)/W . Why this big slack between?

Hello Darwin, the reason is based on thermodynamics. The process of compression and expansion of gases is extremely inefficient in practice. Theoretically, the calculation of maximum EER is based on the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics. When this law is applied to practical heating or, inversely, cooling system, the percentage of input energy that is transformed into useful work drops significantly.

“To calculate the theoretical maximum EER for these conditions we have to plug the temperature (in degrees Celsius) ..”

I am not getting your point right. Relating EER to COP, measuring Temperature in Fahrenheit, converting it to Kelvin and asking for degrees Celisus?

I think that is the ideal theoretical figures one must opt for when looking for an A/C which doesn’t exist!

Interestingly, I cannot see the Inverter technology contribution to any formula that defines an A/C efficiency! Especially that it is electrical power consumption and pollution that we are talking about.

Thanks for simplifying the case

Issam

Hello Issam, you’re right, ideal theoretical figures don’t exist in the ideal world. That is an EER equation derived from the 1st and 2nd Law of Thermodynamics; the purpose of presenting theoretical maximum is for academic-inclined people to understand fully how EER calculation is governed by laws of thermodynamics.

Inverter technology has an effect of EER; namely on the underlying macroscopic metrics such as BTU and Power. The power needed to achieve a high BTU is usually lower with inverter technology thereby the EER is higher.

Thanks for your explanation. I live in Dubai where temperatures reach 50 degrees and from my experience i found that Inverter did reduce my power consumption, as well as placing the condenser in area of less direct sun exposure andreducing the distance between it and the Air Handling unit inside the home (pipes less exposed to outside heat).

I have drifted away from the topic, but i think one should pay more attention to the point that installation is very important to maintain the Efficiency

Well explained in a simple way. Thank you so much.